Bug in reasoning with argumentation: If we try to find “A” is true or “B” in all cases we will find logical arguments pointing validity of “A” and “B” as well? Assume “A” and “B” are two opposite scenarios or they are two different possibility and only one can be true!
don’t think with just reasoning and argumentation the truth will ever arrive because with reasoning we can always come up with many imaginary permutations that will point to the validity of either of the arguments. So there has to be some real life basis to what we talk or otherwise only with imaginary premises we can be taken completely astray?
Debates like Hen or Egg, GOD or no GOD will lead to no answers just on the basis of argumentation? We only need to resort to what was previously told and hold them as true until the tread that was previously told is fully refuted. But here in the modern days we are suddenly following many new premises with no proof just because things come in mind?
All it takes is for someone’s mind to put lens and show an incorrect premise over what is systematically told… that person starts to argue over it and gone… that person goes astray and then others follow and we have a new cult…