With regards to “STATEMENT FROM GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS: FAUJA SINGH” 
“”As much as we’d love to ratify this record, we simply don’t have the proof.”

Fauja Singh is a 101 year old today, who accomplished several running feats. At 101 Fauja Singh still runs!!!

Interesting! did the “Guinness World Records” not try to find facts by other scientific means, did they not try investigating facts using other methods? I guess there are methods to accurately measure age using “Saliva Samples”. Forensic and Criminal investigating agencies probably knows 100s of methods to ascertain age of a person. Wonder why “Guinness World Records” did not use them, or if they did, why did they not publish the same.

What does happen with other records those require age as a parameter? Does “Guinness World Records” not care to test their accuracy. Criminals all over the world are known to fabricate legal documents to suit their needs. So, does it mean “Guinness World Records” can be flawed if the legal documents are fabricated? Again, if “Guinness World Records” ascertains birth record accuracy by scientific methods, wonder why “Guinness World Records” did they not publish the same in this case?

Advertisements